SONGS AND CALLS: PERSPECTIVES ON CREATING A GLOBAL DEFINITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58843/ornneo.v35i2.1361Keywords:
acoustic communication, bioacoustics, call definition, song definition, vocalizationsAbstract
Bird vocalizations have been split historically into two main categories: calls and songs. This categorization has been based mainly on the duration and complexity of the vocalization, although other criteria including function, development, and phylogeny have been included to separate both vocalizations. The increasing number of studies over the last decade examining the structure, function, and evolution of vocalizations, especially for species that breed in the tropics, have revealed that the current definitions for songs and calls no longer match our current knowledge of bird vocalizations. Here, we propose a new global definition for calls and songs that matches our current knowledge on this topic. Additionally, we review several key assumptions that have been used to classify songs, and by association calls, and we present clear examples that contradict these previous assumptions, and thereby limit the definition of songs and calls. Our proposed call and song definitions correct for the ambiguity of previous definitions that use complexity and duration, or omit vocalization functions, and reflects the diverse and multifunctional properties of avian vocalizations.
References
Anderson, TR (2006) Biology of the ubiquitous house sparrow: from genes to populations. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
Andersson, MB (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, UK. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691207278
Baldo, S & DJ Mennill (2011) Vocal behavior of Great Curassows, a vulnerable Neotropical bird. Journal of Field Ornithology 82: 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2011.00328.x
Bonnevie, BT & AJ Craig (2018) A song for the South also: defining birdsong in global terms. Ibis 160: 926–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12627
Budka, M & TS Osiejuk (2017) Microgeographic call variation in a non-learning species, the Corncrake (Crex crex). Journal of Ornithology 158: 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-017-1438-7
Catchpole, CK (1980) Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers in the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74: 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853980X00366
Catchpole, CK & PJB Slater (2008) Bird song, biological themes and variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791
Charrier, I, LL Bloomfield & CB Sturdy (2004) Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. I: The chick-a-dee call of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 82: 769–779. https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-045
Collins, S (2004) Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong. Pp 39–79 in Marler, P & H Slabbekoorn (eds). The nature´s music: the science of birdsongs. Elsevier, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012473070-0/50005-0
Falls, JB (1982) Individual recognition by sound in birds. Pp 237–278 in Kroodsma, DE & EH Miller (eds). Acoustic communication in birds: Volumen 2. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
Ficken, MS, RW Ficken & SR Witkin (1978) Vocal repertoire of the black-capped chickadee. Auk 95: 34–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/4085493
Geberzahn, N, W Goymann, C Muck & C Ten Cate (2009) Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 64: 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0836-0
Gil, D & M Gahr (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02410-2
Hurd, CR (1996) Interspecific attraction to the mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 38: 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050244
Illes, AE (2015) Context of female bias in song repertoire size, singing effort, and singing independence in a cooperatively breeding songbird. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 69: 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1827-3
Mahurin, EJ & TM Freeberg (2008) Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food. Behavioural Ecology 20: 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn121
Marler, P (2004) Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication. Pp 132–177 in Marler, P & H Slabbekoorn (eds). The nature´s music: the science of birdsongs. Elsevier, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012473070-0/50008-6
Marra, PP, EB Cohen, SR Loss, JE Rutter & CM Tonra (2015). A call for full annual cycle research in animal ecology. Biology Letters 11: 20150552. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0552
McGregor, PK & T Dabelsteen (1996) Communicating networks. Pp 409–425 in Kroodsma, DE & EH Miller (eds). Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Méndez, C & L Sandoval (2017) Dual function of chip calls depending on changing call rate related to risk level in territorial pairs of White-eared ground-sparrow. Ethology 123: 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12584
Nelson, DA (1989) The importance of invariant and distinctive features in species recognition of bird song. Condor 91: 120–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368155
Nocera, JJ, PD Taylor & LM Ratcliffe (2008) Inspection of mob-calls as sources of predator information: response of migrant and resident birds in the Neotropics. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 62: 1769–1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0605-5
Odom, KJ, ML Hall, K Riebel, KE Omland & NE Langmore (2014) Female song is widespread and ancestral in songbirds. Nature Communications 5: 3379. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4379
Peters, SS, WA Searcy & P Marler (1980) Species song discrimination in choice experiments with territorial male swamp and song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 28: 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80048-0
Podos, J & PS Warren (2007) The evolution of geographic variation in birdsong. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 37: 403–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37009-5
Price, JJ (2015) Rethinking our assumptions about the evolution of bird song and other sexually dimorphic signals. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00040
Price, JJ, L Yunes-Jiménez, M Osorio-Beristain, KE Omland & TG Murphy (2008) Sex-role reversal in song? Females sing more frequently than males in the streak-backed oriole. Condor 110: 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2008.8430
Sandoval, L, DR Wilson (2022) Neotropical birds respond innately to unfamiliar heterospecific signals of food and threat. American Naturalist 200: 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1086/720441
Seddon, N (2005) Ecological adaptation and species recognition drives vocal evolution in neotropical suboscine birds. Evolution 59: 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00906.x
Slater, PJ & NI Mann (2004) Why do the females of many bird species sing in the tropics? Journal of Avian Biology 35: 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03392.x
Spector, DA (1994) Definition in biology: the case of "bird song". Journal of Theoretical Biology 168: 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1994.1117
Stutchbury, BJM & ES Morton (2001) Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
Tobias, JA & N Seddon (2009) Signal design and perception in Hypocnemis antbirds: evidence of convergent evolution via social selection. Evolution 63: 3168–3189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00795.x
Tobias, JA, V Gamarra-Toledo, D García-Olaechea, PC Pulgarin & N Seddon (2011) Year-round resource defence and the evolution of male and female song in suboscine birds: social armaments are mutual ornaments. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 2118–2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02345.x
Vargas-Castro, LE, L Sandoval & WA Searcy (2017) Eavesdropping avoidance and sound propagation: the acoustic structure of soft song. Animal Behavior 134: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.10.008
Wilson, DR & DJ Mennill (2011) Duty cycle, not signal structure, explains conspecific and heterospecific responses to the calls of black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus). Behavioural Ecology 22: 784–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr051
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Luis Sandoval, Brendan Graham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), that allows others unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, providing the original author and source are credited.
Funding data
-
Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Costa Rica
Grant numbers C2705;C3025
