SONG FREQUENCY SHIFTS IN AN URBAN BIRD SPECIES OPTIMIZE ACOUSTIC TRANSMISSION INSIDE NOISY URBAN AREAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58843/ornneo.v35i2.1363Abstract
In animal acoustic communication is necessary that signals arrive to the receiver with reduced degradation and attenuation for a better transmission of the message. The noise pollution resulting from anthropogenic activities in cities reduces efficiency and efficacy of acoustic communication. Some species respond to high levels of noise increasing the minimum frequency of their vocalizations to avoid noise masking, but this may affect how sounds transmit in the environment because sounds with higher frequencies experience greater levels of attenuation and degradation. Using a transmission experiment, we analyzed how minimum frequency shifts, affect the sound transmission properties of the song of the House Wren (Troglodytes aedon) in urban areas that differ in the level of anthropogenic noise. We broadcasted songs with minimum frequencies between 1.2-1.8 kHz and the same songs with a minimum frequencies increment artificially of one semitone, increasing minimum frequencies to 2.1-2.6 kHz, in high and low noise level territories at four distances. We quantified signal-to-noise ratio, tail-to-signal ratio, blur ratio, and excess attenuation. Our results showed that songs with frequencies low minimum frequencies in low noise territories transmit with higher signal-to-noise ratio, and lower blur ratio and excess attenuation at longer distances. Songs with increased minimum frequencies only showed higher signal-to-noise ratio in noisier territories at longer distances. These results support the hypothesis of producing frequency shift to increase the communication distance in noisier environments. This is the first experimental study that tests the effect of shifting frequency on acoustic communication transmission on bird territories with different noise levels.
References
Barker, NKS, T Dabelsteen & DJ Mennill (2009) Degradation of male and female rufous–and–white wren songs in a tropical forest: effects of sex, perch height, and habitat. Behaviour 146: 1093–1122. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853909X406446
Bermúdez-Cuamatzin, E, AA Ríos-Chelén, D Gil & C Macías (2009) Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour 146: 1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853909X423104
Boncoraglio, G & N Saino (2007) Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Functional Ecology 21: 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01207.x
Bradbury, JW & SL Vehrencamp (2011) Principles of Animal Communication 2nd Edition. Sinauer Press, Sunderland, Massachuset, USA.
Brumm, H (2004) The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00814.x
Brumm, H & D Todt (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Animal Behaviour 63: 891–897. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1968
Brumm, H, R Schmidt & L Schrader (2009) Noise-dependent vocal plasticity in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 78: 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.004
Brumm, H, K Voss, I Köllmer & D Todt (2004) Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. Journal of Experimental Biology 207: 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00768
Cardoso, GC & JW Atwell (2011) On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds. Animal Behaviour 82: 831–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.018
Cardoso, GC & JW Atwell (2012) On amplitude and frequency in birdsong: a reply to Zollinger et al. Animal Behaviour 84: e10–e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.012
Catchpole, CK & PJB Slater (2008) Bird song biological themes and variations. Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754791
Dabelsteen, T, ON Larsen & SB Pedersen (1993) Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 93: 2206–2220. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406682
Duquette, CA, SR Loss & TJ Hovick (2021) A meta‐analysis of the influence of anthropogenic noise on terrestrial wildlife communication strategies. Journal of Applied Ecology 58: 1112–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13880
Ey, E & J Fisher (2009) The “acoustic adaptation hypothesis” a review of the evidence from birds, anurans and mammals. Bioacoustics 19: 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2009.9753613
Fuller, RA, PH Warren & KJ Gaston (2007) Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biology Letters 3: 368–370. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0134
Graham, B, L Sandoval, T Dabelsteen & DJ Mennill (2017) A test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis in three types of tropical forest: degradation of male and female Rufous–and–white Wren songs. Bioacustics 26: 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2016.1181574
Hart, PJ, R Hall, W Ray, A Beck & J Zook (2015) Cicadas impact bird communication in a noisy tropical rainforest. Behavioral Ecology 26: 839–842. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv018
Holland, JO, T Dabelsteen, SB Pedersen & ON Larsen (1998) Degradation of wren Troglodytes troglodytes song: Implications for information transfer and ranging. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 103: 2154–2166. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.421361
Hu, Y & GC Cardoso (2009) Are bird species that vocalize at higher frequencies preadapted to inhabit noisy urban areas? Behavioral Ecology 20: 1268–1273. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp131
Juárez, R, YG Araya-Ajoy, G Barrantes & L Sandoval (2021) House Wrens reduce repertoire size and change song element frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise. Ibis 163: 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12844
Juárez, R, E Chacón-Madrigal & L Sandoval (2020) Urbanization has opposite effects on the territory size of two Passerine birds. Avian Research 11: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-020-00198-6
Krams, I (2001) Perch selection by singing chaffinches: a better view of surroundings and the risk of predation. Behavioral Ecology 12: 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/12.3.295
Lambrechts, MM (1996) Organization of birdsong and constraints on performance. Pp. 305–320 in Kroodsma, DE & EH Miller (eds.) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501736957-025
Lampe, HM, ON Larsen, SB Pedersen & T Dabelsteen (2007) Song degradation in the hole-nesting pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca: Implications for polyterritorial behaviour in contrasting habitat-types. Behaviour 144: 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853907781890887
Langmore, NE (1998) Functions of duets and solo songs of female birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01241-X
Lohr, B, TF Wright & RJ Dooling (2003) Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal. Animal Behaviour 65: 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2003.2093
Luther, DA & EP Derryberry (2012) Birdsongs keep pace with city life: changes in song over time in an urban songbird affects communication. Animal Behaviour 83: 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.034
Marler, PA (2004) Bird calls: a cornucopia from communication. Pp. 132–177 in Marler, P & H Slabbekoorn (eds.) Nature’s music: the science of bird song. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012473070-0/50008-6
Martens, J & G Geduldig (1990) Acoustic adaptations of birds living close to Himalayan torrents. Pp. 123–133 in Garmisch P (ed.) Proceedings of the 100th International Meeting of the Deutsche Ornithologische Gesellschaft; 1989. Verlag der Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft, Germany.
Mathevon, N, T Dabelsteen & SH Blumenrath (2005) Are high perches in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla song or listening posts? A sound transmission study. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 117: 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1828805
Mendez, C, G Barrantes & L Sandoval (2021) The effect of noise over time and between populations on the acoustic characteristics of different vocalization types. Behavioural Processes 182: 104282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104282
Nemeth, E & H Brumm (2010) Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive? American Naturalist 176: 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1086/656275
Nemeth, E, N Pieretti, SA Zollinger, N Geberzahn, J Partecke, AC Miranda & H Brumm (2013) Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities. Proceedings of Royal Society B 280: 20122798. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2798
Nemeth, E, SA Zollinger & H Brumm (2012) Effect sizes and the integrative understanding of urban bird song. American Naturalist 180: 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1086/665994
Pedersen, SB (1998) Preliminary operational manual for signal processor Sigpro. Center of Sound Communication Odense University, Odense, Denmark.
Piza, P & L Sandoval (2016) The differences in transmission properties of two bird calls show relation to their specific functions. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 140: 4271–4275. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4971418
Potvin, DA, KM Parris & RA Mulder (2011) Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proceeding of Royal Society B 278: 2464–2469. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2296
Redondo, P, G Barrantes & L Sandoval (2013) Urban noise influences vocalization structure in the House Wren Troglodytes aedon. Ibis 155: 621–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12053
Sandoval, L (2011) Male–male vocal interactions in a territorial neotropical quail: which song characteristics predict a territorial male’s response? Behaviour 148: 1103–1120. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579511X596570
Sandoval, L, T Dabelsteen & DJ Mennill (2015) Transmission characteristics of solo songs and duets in a neotropical thicket habitat specialist bird. Bioacoustics 24: 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2015.1076346
Slabbekoorn, H (2013) Songs of the city: noise-dependent spectral plasticity in the acoustic phenotype of urban birds. Animal Behaviour 85: 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.021
Slabbekoorn, H (2019) Noise pollution. Current Biology, 29: R957–R960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.07.018
Slabbekoorn, H & A den Boer–Visser (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Current Biology 16: 2326–2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.008
Slabbekoorn, H & M Peet (2003) Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424: 267. https://doi.org/10.1038/424267a
Slabbekoorn, H, XJ Yang & W Halfwerk (2012) Birds and anthropogenic noise: singing higher may matter. American Naturalist 180: 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1086/665991
Stiles, FG & AF Skutch (1989) A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Suthers, RA, F Goller & C Pytte (1999) The neuromuscular control of birdsong. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London 354: 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999.0444
Wiley, RH (1991) Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. American Naturalist 138: 973–993. https://doi.org/10.1086/285263
Zollinger, SA, J Podos, E Nemeth, F Goller & H Brumm (2012) On the relationship between, and measurement of, amplitude and frequency in bird song. Animal Behaviour 84: e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mauricio Villarreal, Gilbert Barrantes, Luis Sandoval
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), that allows others unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, providing the original author and source are credited.
Funding data
-
Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Costa Rica
Grant numbers C3025; C2705
